Research and Writing Biases

Research and writing biases refer to the various biases that can impact the research process and the writing and reporting of research findings.

These biases can influence the selection of research topics, the design and implementation of studies, the interpretation and reporting of results, and the dissemination of findings to the wider public.

Research and writing biases can have significant implications for the accuracy and credibility of research, and can potentially lead to the misinterpretation or misapplication of research findings.

It is important for researchers and writers to be aware of these biases and take steps to minimize their impact on their work.

Research and Writing Biases

Here are some common examples of research and writing biases:

1. Anchoring bias: The tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information encountered when making decisions or forming opinions.
2. Confirmation bias: The tendency to search for, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs and assumptions.
3. Framing effect: The way information is presented can influence how people perceive it and the decisions they make.
4. Halo effect: The tendency to assume that someone who excels in one area will excel in others as well.
5. Horn effect:  The horn effect, also known as the devil effect, is the opposite of the halo effect. It is a type of cognitive bias in which people tend to have a negative perception of others based on a single negative trait or characteristic.
6. Linguistic relativity bias: The linguistic relativity bias, also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, is the idea that language can influence how we think and perceive the world around us.
7. Observer-expectancy bias: The observer-expectancy bias, also known as the experimenter’s bias, refers to the tendency of researchers or experimenters to unconsciously influence the results of a study based on their expectations or biases. This can happen when the researcher’s expectations or beliefs about a particular outcome unconsciously influence how they interact with study participants or collect and interpret data.
8. Publication bias: The tendency for researchers and journals to only publish studies that have statistically significant results.
9. Sampling bias: Occurs when a sample is not representative of the population being studied, resulting in skewed or inaccurate conclusions.
10. Selection bias: Occurs when participants are not randomly selected, resulting in a biased sample that does not accurately represent the population being studied.
11. Stereotyping: The tendency to make assumptions or judgments about individuals or groups based on preconceived notions or generalizations.
12. Survivorship bias: The tendency to focus on the success stories or outcomes of a particular group or situation, while ignoring the failures or those who did not make it.

Examples of How To Use the Research and Writing Biases to Think and Do Better

Here are some examples of how being aware of research and writing biases can help us become better critical thinkers and make more informed decisions:

1. Anchoring bias: To protect yourself from anchoring bias, try to gather as much information as possible before making a decision and avoid relying solely on the first piece of information you receive. An common example of anchoring bias is when a real estate agent intentionally shows a buyer a few overpriced properties before showing them a property that is priced fairly, making the fair-priced property seem like a better deal in comparison.
2. Confirmation bias: When researching a topic, seek out alternative viewpoints and evidence that challenges your beliefs, and be willing to consider them. An example of confirmation bias is when people hold onto their beliefs and ignore contradictory evidence, such as the case of the “Mozart effect” where some parents believed listening to classical music made their children smarter, despite the lack of scientific evidence to support this claim.
3. Framing effect: Be aware of the potential biases that can arise from the way information is presented, and try to evaluate it objectively.  An example of the framing effect is when an advertisement for a weight loss program might frame its message in terms of the number of pounds lost by its customers rather than the percentage of people who successfully completed the program.  Another example of the framing effect is a sales pitch for a product might emphasize the positive benefits of the product rather than potential drawbacks or negative consequences.  And another example would be a news report might frame a story in terms of a particular narrative or angle, such as highlighting the heroism of a particular person or group, rather than presenting a more neutral or objective account of the events.
4. Halo effect: When evaluating a source or piece of writing, try to focus on specific criteria rather than being swayed by one positive attribute.  An example of the halo effect is assuming that an attractive person is also intelligent or competent in their work.  Another example is assuming that someone who is well-dressed and well-groomed is also wealthy or successful.  Another example is assuming that a person who is physically fit and healthy is also more disciplined and hardworking in other areas of their life.
5. Horn effect:  An example of the horn effect is when a highly qualified job candidate is rejected because of a minor flaw or negative characteristic, even though the candidate’s overall qualifications and potential are strong. The best way to protect yourself from the horn effect is to be aware of your own biases and to actively seek out evidence that contradicts your initial negative impression of someone or something. You can also try to evaluate people or things on specific criteria rather than allowing one negative attribute to color your entire perception. Additionally, it’s important to recognize that no one is perfect and everyone has flaws, so try to approach situations with an open mind and without preconceived notions.
6. Linguistic relativity bias: Be aware of the potential biases that can arise from language or cultural differences, and try to evaluate information objectively.  An example of this bias is the perception of color. In some cultures, there are multiple words for what is commonly known as “blue” in English. The Russian language, for example, has different words for light blue and dark blue. Research has shown, in general, that Russian speakers tend to be better at distinguishing between different shades of blue than English speakers. This is because the Russian language encourages the perception of different shades of blue as distinct, while English lumps them all together under one label.
7. Observer-expectancy bias: When conducting research, be aware of the potential biases that can arise from your own expectations or preconceptions and try to eliminate or control for them.  For example, a researcher who expects a particular treatment to be effective may inadvertently communicate that expectation to the participants, leading to biased or inaccurate results. To prevent this bias, researchers can use double-blind or single-blind study designs where neither the participant nor the researcher knows the treatment assignment.
8. Publication bias: Be aware of the potential biases that can arise from selective publication of research findings, and try to seek out additional sources of information.  An example of publication bias is when a researcher only submits papers for publication that show significant results, while not submitting papers with non-significant results. This can lead to an overrepresentation of positive findings in the scientific literature, which can skew the overall understanding of a particular research area.
9. Sampling bias: When evaluating research findings, consider the sampling methods used and whether they may have introduced bias.  An example of sampling bias is a study of job satisfaction only includes responses from employees who choose to participate, which may not accurately represent the opinions of all employees.  Another example is a research study on the effectiveness of a new medication only includes participants who are already taking other medications, which may not be representative of the larger population of potential users.  Another example is a survey of people’s opinions on a political issue only includes responses from a particular age group or demographic, which may not be representative of the larger population.  Another example is a study of student performance only includes data from students who attend a particular school, which may not be representative of all students in the area.
10. Selection bias: When evaluating research findings, consider whether the selection criteria used may have introduced bias.  One interesting example of selection bias is the “healthy user bias” in medical research. This occurs when a study only includes participants who are already healthy or have a low risk of disease, while excluding those who are already sick or at a higher risk of disease. This can lead to overestimating the effectiveness of a treatment or intervention, since the study is not representative of the general population who may benefit from the treatment.  The healthy user bias can also occur in studies that rely on self-reported data, as individuals who are already healthy may be more likely to report positive health behaviors or outcomes. It’s important for researchers to account for and control for selection bias in order to ensure accurate and unbiased results.
11. Stereotyping: Be aware of the potential biases that can arise from stereotyping, and try to evaluate information objectively.  To protect yourself from stereotyping, try to approach each individual as a unique and complex person rather than relying on preconceived notions or assumptions.  An example of stereotyping is assuming that all members of a particular race, gender, or religion have certain qualities or characteristics based on preconceived notions or societal biases.  Stereotyping can be harmful as it leads to unfair treatment and discrimination against individuals based on their group membership rather than their individual qualities or actions.
12. Survivorship bias: When evaluating research findings, consider whether the results may have been influenced by survivorship bias, and seek out additional sources of information if necessary.  An example of survivorship bias is only looking at successful individuals or entities and failing to consider those that failed and were not included in the sample.  During World War II, the military tried to reduce the number of planes being lost in combat by adding more armor. However, Abraham Wald, a statistician, argued that the military was suffering from survivorship bias because they were only looking at the planes that came back with damage, instead of looking at the ones that were shot down and never returned. Wald suggested that the planes should have less armor in the areas where the surviving planes had no damage, as those areas were likely not crucial for the plane’s survival.

Believe None of What You Hear and Only Half of What You See

As the saying goes:

“Believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see.”

It’s a cautionary reminder to be skeptical of information that we receive and to only trust what we can confirm through our own observations and critical thinking.

It suggests that we should question everything and not simply accept things at face value.

Know Your Researching and Writing Biases to Think and Do Better

Being aware of research and writing biases is crucial in ensuring that your information and conclusions are accurate and well-supported.

By recognizing and avoiding these biases, you can increase the reliability and validity of your research and writing, and ultimately, make more informed decisions.

You Might Also Like

Big List of Biases
Attention Biases
Attitude and Belief Biases
Communication Biases
Cultural Biases
Decision-Making Biases
Emotional Biases
Evaluation Biases
Investment and Commitment Biases
Language Biases
Motivational Biases
Perception and Memory Biases
Probability and Randomness Biases
Psychological Biases
Scotoma: Why You Can’t See What’s Right in Front of You
How Labeling Others Distorts Your Thinking
How To Improve Your Critical Thinking
How To Practice Precision Questions and Answers